MHCLG · IoD2025 (published November 2025) · Local authority

Income-deprived residents by local authority

The share of residents living in income-deprived families — on certain means-tested benefits or low-income tax credits — from the Income Deprivation Domain of IoD2025, averaged over each district's small areas. Unlike the headline IMD score, this is a proportion of people, so it is meaningful in itself and not only as a rank.

Loading map…
Loading income deprivation rate

Broxbourne

22.2%Income-deprived residents, per cent

22.2% of residents of Broxbourne live in income-deprived families (IoD2025 (published November 2025)) — joint 120th highest of 296 areas with a published figure.

Area
Broxbourne (E07000095)
Income-deprived residents, per cent
22.2%
Rank
joint 120th highest of 296 areas with a published figure
Percentile
60% of areas with a figure are below it
Period
IoD2025 (published November 2025)
Release
IoD2025 (v2), released 2025-11-17
Published by
MHCLG
Status
Published figure, unchanged
22.2% of residents of Broxbourne live in income-deprived families (IoD2025 (published November 2025)) — joint 120th highest of 296 areas with a published figure. Source: MHCLG.
Civometry · IoD2025 (published November 2025)

Everything Civometry holds for Broxbourne

Highest areas

Lowest areas

#Area% of residents
296Isles of Scilly · profile6.0%
295City of London · profile6.6%
294Hart · profile9.2%
293Wokingham · profile9.3%
292Waverley · profile10.5%
291Rutland · profile10.5%
290Ribble Valley · profile10.6%
289South Oxfordshire · profile10.7%
288Rushcliffe · profile10.9%
287Harborough · profile11.1%
All 296 areas, ranked
#Area% of residents
1Birmingham · profile41.7%
2Tower Hamlets · profile40.1%
3Hackney · profile40.0%
4Newham · profile39.0%
5Barking and Dagenham · profile38.4%
6Blackpool · profile37.7%
7Enfield · profile37.7%
8Middlesbrough · profile37.5%
9Sandwell · profile37.4%
10Blackburn with Darwen · profile37.2%
11Manchester · profile37.2%
12Brent · profile36.7%
13Luton · profile36.5%
14Oldham · profile36.5%
15Kingston upon Hull, City of · profile36.3%
16Wolverhampton · profile35.8%
17Bradford · profile35.7%
18Hartlepool · profile35.7%
19Walsall · profile35.6%
20Haringey · profile35.4%
21Burnley · profile35.0%
22Rochdale · profile34.6%
23Leicester · profile34.5%
24Liverpool · profile34.3%
25Knowsley · profile34.2%
26Pendle · profile33.7%
27Nottingham · profile33.4%
28Stoke-on-Trent · profile33.1%
29Bolton · profile32.9%
30Hastings · profile32.9%
31Hyndburn · profile32.8%
32Ealing · profile31.8%
33South Tyneside · profile31.7%
34Great Yarmouth · profile31.5%
35Salford · profile31.2%
36Peterborough · profile31.0%
37Sunderland · profile30.8%
38Thanet · profile30.5%
39Islington · profile30.4%
40North East Lincolnshire · profile30.1%
41Redcar and Cleveland · profile29.7%
42Derby · profile29.6%
43Rotherham · profile29.6%
44Tameside · profile29.6%
45Waltham Forest · profile29.6%
46Halton · profile29.4%
47Coventry · profile29.3%
48Doncaster · profile29.3%
49Hounslow · profile28.9%
50Slough · profile28.9%
51Lewisham · profile28.7%
52Gateshead · profile28.3%
53Barnsley · profile27.9%
54Boston · profile27.9%
55Preston · profile27.9%
56Newcastle upon Tyne · profile27.8%
57Sheffield · profile27.8%
58Croydon · profile27.7%
59Greenwich · profile27.7%
60Telford and Wrekin · profile27.5%
61Redbridge · profile27.4%
62Norwich · profile27.2%
63St. Helens · profile27.1%
64Kirklees · profile26.9%
65Dudley · profile26.7%
66Ipswich · profile26.7%
67Tendring · profile26.7%
68Camden · profile26.6%
69County Durham · profile26.6%
70Southwark · profile26.6%
71Harlow · profile26.5%
72Eastbourne · profile26.4%
73Mansfield · profile26.4%
74Calderdale · profile26.3%
75Wirral · profile26.3%
76East Lindsey · profile26.2%
77Ashfield · profile26.0%
78Lambeth · profile26.0%
79Torbay · profile26.0%
80Portsmouth · profile25.9%
81Southampton · profile25.9%
82Barnet · profile25.7%
83Hillingdon · profile25.7%
84Stockton-on-Tees · profile25.6%
85Wakefield · profile25.6%
86Harrow · profile25.5%
87Westminster · profile25.4%
88Bury · profile25.2%
89Chesterfield · profile25.2%
90Southend-on-Sea · profile25.2%
91Lincoln · profile25.1%
92Crawley · profile24.9%
93Darlington · profile24.8%
94Bolsover · profile24.6%
95Leeds · profile24.6%
96Sefton · profile24.5%
97Plymouth · profile24.4%
98Gravesham · profile24.2%
99Swale · profile24.2%
100Basildon · profile24.1%
101Nuneaton and Bedworth · profile24.1%
102Hammersmith and Fulham · profile23.9%
103Wigan · profile23.9%
104Dover · profile23.8%
105Fenland · profile23.8%
106Medway · profile23.8%
107Rossendale · profile23.8%
108Thurrock · profile23.7%
109Folkestone and Hythe · profile23.5%
110Isle of Wight · profile23.4%
111North Lincolnshire · profile23.4%
112Redditch · profile22.9%
113Stevenage · profile22.9%
114Havant · profile22.8%
115Tamworth · profile22.6%
116North Tyneside · profile22.5%
117Wyre Forest · profile22.4%
118Gosport · profile22.3%
119Broxbourne · profile22.2%
120Gloucester · profile22.2%
121Watford · profile22.1%
122Cannock Chase · profile22.0%
123Cornwall · profile22.0%
124Bassetlaw · profile21.9%
125Bristol, City of · profile21.8%
126Bedford · profile21.6%
127Brighton and Hove · profile21.3%
128East Staffordshire · profile21.1%
129Reading · profile21.1%
130Milton Keynes · profile21.0%
131Worcester · profile21.0%
132Erewash · profile20.8%
133Northumberland · profile20.7%
134Torridge · profile20.7%
135Ashford · profile20.5%
136North Northamptonshire · profile20.4%
137Wyre · profile20.4%
138Havering · profile20.3%
139Merton · profile20.3%
140Lancaster · profile20.2%
141South Holland · profile20.2%
142Swindon · profile20.2%
143West Lindsey · profile20.1%
144Cumberland · profile20.0%
145Wandsworth · profile20.0%
146North Devon · profile19.9%
147Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · profile19.8%
148King's Lynn and West Norfolk · profile19.8%
149Newark and Sherwood · profile19.8%
150Rother · profile19.8%
151Canterbury · profile19.6%
152Kensington and Chelsea · profile19.6%
153East Suffolk · profile19.5%
154West Lancashire · profile19.5%
155Lewes · profile19.4%
156Solihull · profile19.4%
157Newcastle-under-Lyme · profile19.3%
158North East Derbyshire · profile19.3%
159Amber Valley · profile19.1%
160Arun · profile19.1%
161Breckland · profile18.9%
162North Norfolk · profile18.8%
163Stockport · profile18.8%
164Bexley · profile18.7%
165North Warwickshire · profile18.7%
166Worthing · profile18.7%
167Colchester · profile18.6%
168Rushmoor · profile18.6%
169Adur · profile18.4%
170Hertsmere · profile18.4%
171Sutton · profile18.4%
172Welwyn Hatfield · profile18.4%
173Cheshire West and Chester · profile18.3%
174Dartford · profile18.3%
175Maidstone · profile18.3%
176Forest of Dean · profile18.2%
177Warrington · profile18.2%
178Gedling · profile18.1%
179Somerset · profile18.1%
180West Northamptonshire · profile18.1%
181Dacorum · profile18.0%
182Braintree · profile17.9%
183Herefordshire, County of · profile17.9%
184Teignbridge · profile17.7%
185Castle Point · profile17.4%
186Mid Devon · profile17.3%
187Oadby and Wigston · profile17.3%
188South Kesteven · profile17.3%
189Trafford · profile17.1%
190Fylde · profile16.9%
191High Peak · profile16.9%
192Spelthorne · profile16.9%
193Chorley · profile16.8%
194North Somerset · profile16.8%
195Shropshire · profile16.8%
196Wychavon · profile16.7%
197Broxtowe · profile16.5%
198Exeter · profile16.5%
199Dorset · profile16.4%
200Kingston upon Thames · profile16.4%
201West Devon · profile16.4%
202Chichester · profile16.3%
203East Riding of Yorkshire · profile16.3%
204Malvern Hills · profile16.2%
205Rugby · profile16.2%
206South Derbyshire · profile16.1%
207South Ribble · profile16.1%
208Epping Forest · profile16.0%
209Melton · profile16.0%
210North West Leicestershire · profile16.0%
211Oxford · profile16.0%
212Bromley · profile15.8%
213West Suffolk · profile15.8%
214Cheltenham · profile15.7%
215Charnwood · profile15.6%
216Hinckley and Bosworth · profile15.6%
217South Staffordshire · profile15.6%
218Tewkesbury · profile15.6%
219Babergh · profile15.5%
220Maldon · profile15.4%
221Stafford · profile15.4%
222Central Bedfordshire · profile15.3%
223Tonbridge and Malling · profile15.3%
224Woking · profile15.2%
225Tunbridge Wells · profile15.1%
226Lichfield · profile15.0%
227North Hertfordshire · profile15.0%
228South Hams · profile15.0%
229Cheshire East · profile14.9%
230East Devon · profile14.9%
231North Yorkshire · profile14.9%
232Basingstoke and Deane · profile14.8%
233North Kesteven · profile14.8%
234Wiltshire · profile14.8%
235Chelmsford · profile14.6%
236Westmorland and Furness · profile14.6%
237Cherwell · profile14.5%
238Eastleigh · profile14.3%
239New Forest · profile14.3%
240Huntingdonshire · profile14.2%
241South Gloucestershire · profile14.2%
242Wealden · profile14.1%
243Buckinghamshire · profile14.0%
244Sevenoaks · profile14.0%
245South Norfolk · profile14.0%
246Staffordshire Moorlands · profile14.0%
247Runnymede · profile13.9%
248Stratford-on-Avon · profile13.8%
249Bath and North East Somerset · profile13.7%
250East Cambridgeshire · profile13.7%
251Blaby · profile13.5%
252Broadland · profile13.5%
253Stroud · profile13.5%
254Three Rivers · profile13.5%
255Test Valley · profile13.4%
256Bracknell Forest · profile13.3%
257Mid Suffolk · profile13.3%
258Rochford · profile13.3%
259West Berkshire · profile13.3%
260Cambridge · profile13.2%
261Tandridge · profile13.2%
262Warwick · profile13.1%
263York · profile13.1%
264Reigate and Banstead · profile13.0%
265Vale of White Horse · profile12.9%
266Bromsgrove · profile12.8%
267Brentwood · profile12.7%
268East Hertfordshire · profile12.7%
269St Albans · profile12.5%
270Derbyshire Dales · profile12.4%
271East Hampshire · profile12.2%
272Richmond upon Thames · profile12.2%
273West Oxfordshire · profile12.2%
274Winchester · profile12.2%
275Cotswold · profile12.1%
276Mid Sussex · profile12.1%
277Horsham · profile12.0%
278Elmbridge · profile11.8%
279Epsom and Ewell · profile11.8%
280South Cambridgeshire · profile11.8%
281Uttlesford · profile11.6%
282Surrey Heath · profile11.4%
283Fareham · profile11.3%
284Guildford · profile11.3%
285Mole Valley · profile11.3%
286Windsor and Maidenhead · profile11.3%
287Harborough · profile11.1%
288Rushcliffe · profile10.9%
289South Oxfordshire · profile10.7%
290Ribble Valley · profile10.6%
291Rutland · profile10.5%
292Waverley · profile10.5%
293Wokingham · profile9.3%
294Hart · profile9.2%
295City of London · profile6.6%
296Isles of Scilly · profile6.0%

Ranked by income-deprived residents, per cent, highest first; ties in alphabetical order. Areas without a value are not ranked.

What this map shows

296 of 296 local authority areas have a current value for income-deprived residents (income-deprived residents, per cent), IoD2025 (published November 2025). Classes are quantiles of the areas with data, computed on the server, so the same link always gives the same legend.

The published population-weighted average of the district's LSOA domain scores, shown as a percentage of residents.

Take the data

Embed (static map with title, period, official source and a link back):

<iframe src="https://civometry.com/embed/maps/income-deprivation/all/latest?level=lad&measure=count" width="720" height="700" style="border:0;max-width:100%" title="Income-deprived residents, income-deprived residents, per cent, by local authority: IoD2025 (published November 2025) | Civometry" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Source and method

Data
English Indices of Deprivation: local authority district summaries (MHCLG).
Denominator
The domain score is itself a proportion of the resident population, published by MHCLG; no further division is done here. English Indices of Deprivation: local authority district summaries.
Boundaries
ONS Open Geography Portal generalised boundaries, Open Government Licence v3.0 (2025-05 BGC v2 LAD_MAY_2025_UK_BGC_V2).
Basemap
Ordnance Survey Maps API (Light), used under the OS Data Hub terms.
Formula
the published domain score for the district, which is itself a proportion, shown as a percentage
Stale areas
The index is a single publication; a district with no published summary is drawn as no data.
Method
Methodology

Other maps