Contract award · Contracts Finder · ocds-b5fd17-bcf57a11-53a3-4a5b-9420-29f50165e060-1

GB-London: Further Competition for Security Systems Maintenance under ESPO Security and Surveillance 628_23 Lot 2

Identity
contract:contracts_finder:ocds-b5fd17-bcf57a11-53a3-4a5b-9420-29f50165e060-1 — the Contracts Finder key, used as-is. No identity here is invented.
Source record
https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/77a8828b-884f-43cf-8e05-e935334c6bdd
On Civometry
Full page for GB-London: Further Competition for Security Systems Maintenance under ESPO Security and Surveillance 628_23 Lot 2
Graph built
5 September 2026

Names in the records

Each spelling a register uses for this entity, and the method that tied it here. A name is never the identity; a similar name is never a match.

As publishedRegisterTied byConfidenceRows

What the records establish

  • GB-London: Further Competition for Security Systems Maintenance under ESPO Security and Surveillance 628_23 Lot 2: 1 record of "contract awarded by" on 30 June 2026, £350,000 in total where a figure is published.
  • GB-London: Further Competition for Security Systems Maintenance under ESPO Security and Surveillance 628_23 Lot 2: 1 record of "awarded to" on 30 June 2026, £350,000 in total where a figure is published.
All 2 recorded relationships. Kind: FACT — every row is a register's own record; nothing on this page is computed.
RelationshipWithDateAmountDetailRecord
contract awarded byNatural History Museum30 June 2026£350,000Repair and maintenance services of security equipmentpublic_contracts
awarded toReliance High-Tech Ltd30 June 2026£350,000Repair and maintenance services of security equipmentpublic_contracts

What this does not establish

The records above establish that GB-London: Further Competition for Security Systems Maintenance under ESPO Security and Surveillance 628_23 Lot 2 and each entity named appear together in an official register, in the relationship that register records, on the date it records. They do not establish why any donation was made, why any contract was awarded, whether any one record was known to the people behind another, or that any record caused another. No causal inference is made on this page, and nothing here is a finding of any kind against anyone. A reported donation is a lawful, reported transaction; a contract award is a published notice; a seat is a seat.

Derived from: public_contracts. Each row above names the table and key it came from and links the official record where one exists. How the graph is built is described at the evidence graph.