Civometry

Civometry · CALCULATION

Computed connections

18 companies appear both as a reported donor and as a public-contract supplier in the registers Civometry holds; 9 donation–award pairs fall within a year of each other.

These are the only two computations the site makes across registers. Both rest on a Companies House number published by both registers — never on a name. The list is ordered by the size and recency of the sums involved, and that ordering is all the ordering means. The registers loaded are recent windows (Contracts Finder and Find a Tender awards from the last weeks; donations from 2019), so absence from this page says nothing about a company either.

Reported donor and public supplier

Each item below is a CALCULATION: two or more register rows that name the same company, put side by side. The rows are linked at the end of each item. Nothing here is a finding.

  1. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 6 donations totalling £94,816 from DLA PIPER UK LLP to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 2 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £515,000, by NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL and UK SHARED BUSINESS SERVICES LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  2. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 4 donations totalling £98,965 from ERNST & YOUNG LLP to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £108,950, by NHS KENT AND MEDWAY ICB, National Audit Office and Government Property Agency. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  3. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 3 donations totalling £230,060 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £913,078, by NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED and FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  4. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 3 donations totalling £131,582 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £913,078, by NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED and FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  5. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £35,000 from ATKINSRÉALIS UK LIMITED to Labour Housing Group; the procurement registers record 4 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £1,075,981, by National Highways Limited, Oxfordshire County Council and TRANSPORT FOR LONDON. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  6. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 2 donations totalling £78,417 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Liberal Democrats; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £913,078, by NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED and FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  7. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £7,500 from MORGAN SINDALL CONSTRUCTION & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD to Mr John Stevenson MP; the procurement registers record 2 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £41,877,415, by Stevenage Borough Council and The Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  8. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 2 donations totalling £23,084 from GRANT THORNTON UK LLP to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 2 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £163,959, by HM TREASURY and Greater Manchester Combined Authority. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  9. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £30,062 from BARINGA PARTNERS LLP to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 3 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £1,059,750, by Cabinet Office, Ofgem and Civil Aviation Authority. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  10. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 2 donations totalling £58,733 from OLIVER WYMAN LIMITED to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £191,720, by O F W A T. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  11. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £7,500 from TETRA TECH LIMITED to Mr John Stevenson MP; the procurement registers record 2 contract awards to the same company with published values totalling £157,727, by DERBY CITY COUNCIL and National Highways Limited. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  12. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 2 donations totalling £52,000 from SENATOR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED to Conservative and Unionist Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £287,474, by MINISTRY OF DEFENCE. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  13. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 2 donations totalling £5,354 from SENATOR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED to Mr Mark Eastwood; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £287,474, by MINISTRY OF DEFENCE. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  14. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £30,000 from MICROSOFT LIMITED to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £965,910, by DVLA - Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  15. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £36,000 from FACULTY SCIENCE LIMITED to Labour Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £527,498, by POLICE DIGITAL SERVICE. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  16. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £36,000 from FACULTY SCIENCE LIMITED to Peter Kyle; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £527,498, by POLICE DIGITAL SERVICE. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  17. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £14,417 from FUJITSU SERVICES LIMITED to Conservative and Unionist Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £55,401,666, by the Education Authority. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

  18. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £20,000 from PERTEMPS RECRUITMENT PARTNERSHIP LIMITED to Conservative and Unionist Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £98,775, by Essex County Council. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

    The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

A donation and an award within a year

Each item below is a CALCULATION: two or more register rows that name the same company, put side by side. The rows are linked at the end of each item. Nothing here is a finding.

  1. The records establish: on 31 March 2026 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £91,214 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 1 August 2026 FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED published an award to the same company of External Audit Services (£710,000). The two dates are 123 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  2. The records establish: on 18 December 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £87,381 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 1 August 2026 FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED published an award to the same company of External Audit Services (£710,000). The two dates are 226 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  3. The records establish: on 30 September 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £51,465 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 1 August 2026 FAIR4ALL FINANCE LIMITED published an award to the same company of External Audit Services (£710,000). The two dates are 305 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  4. The records establish: on 31 March 2026 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £91,214 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 9 July 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1341 - Project Oracle - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£104,078). The two dates are 100 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  5. The records establish: on 18 December 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £87,381 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 9 July 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1341 - Project Oracle - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£104,078). The two dates are 203 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  6. The records establish: on 30 September 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £51,465 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 9 July 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1341 - Project Oracle - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£104,078). The two dates are 282 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  7. The records establish: on 31 March 2026 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £91,214 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 26 January 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1155 - Project Supercharge - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£99,000). The two dates are 64 days apart, the award first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  8. The records establish: on 18 December 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £87,381 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 26 January 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1155 - Project Supercharge - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£99,000). The two dates are 39 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

  9. The records establish: on 30 September 2025 the Electoral Commission’s register records a donation of £51,465 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP to Conservative and Unionist Party; on 26 January 2026 NATIONAL WEALTH FUND LIMITED published an award to the same company of C1155 - Project Supercharge - Financial and Tax Due Diligence (£99,000). The two dates are 118 days apart, the donation first. The interval is arithmetic on the two published dates.

    The records do not establish any connection between the two events. Procurement is a regulated process with its own published notice; a reported donation is a lawful transaction. Proximity in time is not evidence of a link, and none is asserted.

How identity is decided and what a relationship is are set out at the evidence graph. Sources: Electoral Commission register of donations; Contracts Finder and Find a Tender (Open Government Licence v3); Companies House.