FUJITSU SERVICES LIMITED

Names in the records

Each spelling a register uses for this entity, and the method that tied it here. A name is never the identity; a similar name is never a match.

What the records establish

• FUJITSU SERVICES LIMITED: 1 record of "contract awarded to this supplier" on 30 November 2015, £55,401,666 in total where a figure is published.
• FUJITSU SERVICES LIMITED: 1 record of "reported donation to" on 25 June 2019, £14,417 in total where a figure is published.

What Civometry computed from these records

Each item below is a CALCULATION: two or more register rows that name the same company, put side by side. The rows are linked at the end of each item. Nothing here is a finding.

1. The records establish: the Electoral Commission’s register records 1 donation totalling £14,417 from FUJITSU SERVICES LIMITED to Conservative and Unionist Party; the procurement registers record 1 contract award to the same company with published values totalling £55,401,666, by the Education Authority. The company is identified in both registers by its Companies House number.

   The records do not establish why any donation was made or any contract awarded, that either side knew of the other, or that one had any bearing on the other. A donation is a lawful, reported transaction and a contract award is a published notice; no causal inference is made.

What this does not establish

The records above establish that FUJITSU SERVICES LIMITED and each entity named appear together in an official register, in the relationship that register records, on the date it records. They do not establish why any donation was made, why any contract was awarded, whether any one record was known to the people behind another, or that any record caused another. No causal inference is made on this page, and nothing here is a finding of any kind against anyone. A reported donation is a lawful, reported transaction; a contract award is a published notice; a seat is a seat.